An LLM knows every work of Shakespeare but can’t say which it read first. In this material sense a model hasn’t read at all.
To read is to think. Only at inference is there space for serendipitous inspiration, which is why LLMs have so little of it to show for all they’ve seen.
Recent articles
- Building software on top of Large Language Models - 15th May 2025
- Trying out llama.cpp's new vision support - 10th May 2025
- Saying "hi" to Microsoft's Phi-4-reasoning - 6th May 2025