Meg replies
15th June 2002
Meg has replied to Jonathan’s criticism of her piece on the nature of blogging via his site’s comments system. She defends her original viewpoint, commenting on blogging that we can’t define this thing based on the content we’re outputting
. It looks like this debate still has quite a bit of life left in it.
More recent articles
- Trying out llama.cpp's new vision support - 10th May 2025
- Saying "hi" to Microsoft's Phi-4-reasoning - 6th May 2025
- Feed a video to a vision LLM as a sequence of JPEG frames on the CLI (also LLM 0.25) - 5th May 2025