Misapplying book terms, Pylons, and the 'end-user'. Ben Bangert responds to Adam Gomaa’s claim that Pylons lacks “conceptual integrity”.
Recent articles
- Building software on top of Large Language Models - 15th May 2025
- Trying out llama.cpp's new vision support - 10th May 2025
- Saying "hi" to Microsoft's Phi-4-reasoning - 6th May 2025