Misapplying book terms, Pylons, and the 'end-user'. Ben Bangert responds to Adam Gomaa’s claim that Pylons lacks “conceptual integrity”.
Recent articles
- My review of Claude's new Code Interpreter, released under a very confusing name - 9th September 2025
- Recreating the Apollo AI adoption rate chart with GPT-5, Python and Pyodide - 9th September 2025
- GPT-5 Thinking in ChatGPT (aka Research Goblin) is shockingly good at search - 6th September 2025