Tuesday, 8th October 2024
Django Commons. Django Commons is a really promising initiative started by Tim Schilling, aimed at the problem of keeping key Django community projects responsibly maintained on a long-term basis.
Django Commons is an organization dedicated to supporting the community's efforts to maintain packages. It seeks to improve the maintenance experience for all contributors; reducing the barrier to entry for new contributors and reducing overhead for existing maintainers.
I’ve stated recently that I’d love to see the Django Software Foundation take on this role - adopting projects and ensuring they are maintained long-term. Django Commons looks like it solves that exact problem, assuring the future of key projects beyond their initial creators.
So far the Commons has taken on responsibility for django-fsm-2, django-tasks-scheduler and, as-of this week, diango-typer.
Here’s Tim introducing the project back in May. Thoughtful governance has been baked in from the start:
Having multiple administrators makes the role more sustainable, lessens the impact of a person stepping away, and shortens response time for administrator requests. It’s important to me that the organization starts with multiple administrators so that collaboration and documentation are at the forefront of all decisions.
Anthropic: Message Batches (beta) (via) Anthropic now have a batch mode, allowing you to send prompts to Claude in batches which will be processed within 24 hours (though probably much faster than that) and come at a 50% price discount.
This matches the batch models offered by OpenAI and by Google Gemini, both of which also provide a 50% discount.
Update 15th October 2024: Alex Albert confirms that Anthropic batching and prompt caching can be combined:
Don't know if folks have realized yet that you can get close to a 95% discount on Claude 3.5 Sonnet tokens when you combine prompt caching with the new Batches API
If we had $1,000,000…. Jacob Kaplan-Moss gave my favorite talk at DjangoCon this year, imagining what the Django Software Foundation could do if it quadrupled its annual income to $1 million and laying out a realistic path for getting there. Jacob suggests leaning more into large donors than increasing our small donor base:
It’s far easier for me to picture convincing eight or ten or fifteen large companies to make large donations than it is to picture increasing our small donor base tenfold. So I think a major donor strategy is probably the most realistic one for us.
So when I talk about major donors, who am I talking about? I’m talking about four major categories: large corporations, high net worth individuals (very wealthy people), grants from governments (e.g. the Sovereign Tech Fund run out of Germany), and private foundations (e.g. the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, who’s given grants to the PSF in the past).
Also included: a TIL on Turning a conference talk into an annotated presentation. Jacob used my annotated presentation tool to OCR text from images of keynote slides, extracted a Whisper transcript from the YouTube livestream audio and then cleaned that up a little with LLM and Claude 3.5 Sonnet ("Split the content of this transcript up into paragraphs with logical breaks. Add newlines between each paragraph.") before editing and re-writing it all into the final post.