[… OpenAI’s o1] could work its way to a correct (and well-written) solution if provided a lot of hints and prodding, but did not generate the key conceptual ideas on its own, and did make some non-trivial mistakes. The experience seemed roughly on par with trying to advise a mediocre, but not completely incompetent, graduate student. However, this was an improvement over previous models, whose capability was closer to an actually incompetent graduate student.
Recent articles
- Notes on using LLMs for code - 20th September 2024
- Things I've learned serving on the board of the Python Software Foundation - 18th September 2024
- Notes on OpenAI's new o1 chain-of-thought models - 12th September 2024