23rd December 2025
If this [MicroQuickJS] had been available in 2010, Redis scripting would have been JavaScript and not Lua. Lua was chosen based on the implementation requirements, not on the language ones... (small, fast, ANSI-C). I appreciate certain ideas in Lua, and people love it, but I was never able to like Lua, because it departs from a more Algol-like syntax and semantics without good reasons, for my taste. This creates friction for newcomers. I love friction when it opens new useful ideas and abstractions that are worth it, if you learn SmallTalk or FORTH and for some time you are lost, it's part of how the languages are different. But I think for Lua this is not true enough: it feels like it departs from what people know without good reasons.
— Salvatore Sanfilippo, Hacker News comment on MicroQuickJS
Recent articles
- DeepSeek V4 - almost on the frontier, a fraction of the price - 24th April 2026
- Extract PDF text in your browser with LiteParse for the web - 23rd April 2026
- A pelican for GPT-5.5 via the semi-official Codex backdoor API - 23rd April 2026