Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY does not scale (via) I think this headline is justified. Recall.ai, a provider of meeting transcription bots, noticed that their PostgreSQL instance was being bogged down by heavy concurrent writes.
After some spelunking they found this comment in the PostgreSQL source explaining that transactions with a pending notification take out a global lock against the entire PostgreSQL instance (represented by database 0) to ensure "that queue entries appear in commit order".
Moving away from LISTEN/NOTIFY to trigger actions on changes to rows gave them a significant performance boost under high write loads.
Recent articles
- Designing agentic loops - 30th September 2025
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 is probably the "best coding model in the world" (at least for now) - 29th September 2025
- I think "agent" may finally have a widely enough agreed upon definition to be useful jargon now - 18th September 2025