7th November 2025
My trepidation extends to complex literature searches. I use LLMs as secondary librarians when I’m doing research. They reliably find primary sources (articles, papers, etc.) that I miss in my initial searches.
But these searches are dangerous. I distrust LLM librarians. There is so much data in the world: you can (in good faith!) find evidence to support almost any position or conclusion. ChatGPT is not a human, and, unlike teachers & librarians & scholars, ChatGPT does not have a consistent, legible worldview. In my experience, it readily agrees with any premise you hand it — and brings citations. It may have read every article that can be read, but it has no real opinion — so it is not a credible expert.
— Ben Stolovitz, How I use AI
Recent articles
- Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, and a new price war - 22nd September 2026
- Jev introduces a new shape of LLM - System One, aka Decision Models - 21st September 2026
- Generating running routes with GPT-6 Astra and ChatGPT Work - 12th September 2026