16th October 2026
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"
Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.
Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.
— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review
Recent articles
- Qwen 3.8 27B on my laptop can interpret model weights, too - 3rd November 2026
- The U.S. Census Bureau and “Super Intelligence” - 2nd November 2026
- The October inflection point for vibe game development - 28th October 2026
- Battle Drones - a vibe coded RTS with audio-based multiplayer - 20th October 2026