Simon Willison’s Weblog

Gemini 2.0 Flash and Flash-Lite (via) Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is now generally available - previously it was available just as a preview - and has announced pricing. The model is $0.075/million input tokens and $0.030/million output - the same price as Gemini 1.5 Flash.

Google call this "simplified pricing" because 1.5 Flash charged different cost-per-tokens depending on if you used more than 128,000 tokens. 2.0 Flash-Lite (and 2.0 Flash) are both priced the same no matter how many tokens you use.

I released llm-gemini 0.12 with support for the new gemini-2.0-flash-lite model ID. I've also updated my LLM pricing calculator with the new prices.

# 25th February 2025, 8:16 pm / gemini, google, generative-ai, llm-pricing, ai, llms, llm, projects, llm-release

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Claude Code. Anthropic released Claude 3.7 Sonnet today - skipping the name "Claude 3.6" because the Anthropic user community had already started using that as the unofficial name for their October update to 3.5 Sonnet.

As you may expect, 3.7 Sonnet is an improvement over 3.5 Sonnet - and is priced the same, at $3/million tokens for input and $15/m output.

The big difference is that this is Anthropic's first "reasoning" model - applying the same trick that we've now seen from OpenAI o1 and o3, Grok 3, Google Gemini 2.0 Thinking, DeepSeek R1 and Qwen's QwQ and QvQ. The only big model families without an official reasoning model now are Mistral and Meta's Llama.

I'm still working on adding support to my llm-anthropic plugin but I've got enough working code that I was able to get it to draw me a pelican riding a bicycle. Here's the non-reasoning model:

And here's that same prompt but with "thinking mode" enabled:

Here's the transcript for that second one, which mixes together the thinking and the output tokens. I'm still working through how best to differentiate between those two types of token.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a training cut-off date of Oct 2024 - an improvement on 3.5 Haiku's July 2024 - and can output up to 64,000 tokens in thinking mode (some of which are used for thinking tokens) and up to 128,000 if you enable a special header:

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can produce substantially longer responses than previous models with support for up to 128K output tokens (beta)---more than 15x longer than other Claude models. This expanded capability is particularly effective for extended thinking use cases involving complex reasoning, rich code generation, and comprehensive content creation.

This feature can be enabled by passing an anthropic-beta header of output-128k-2025-02-19.

Anthropic's other big release today is a preview of Claude Code - a CLI tool for interacting with Claude that includes the ability to prompt Claude in terminal chat and have it read and modify files and execute commands. This means it can both iterate on code and execute tests, making it an extremely powerful "agent" for coding assistance.

Here's Anthropic's documentation on getting started with Claude Code, which uses OAuth (a first for Anthropic's API) to authenticate against your API account, so you'll need to configure billing.

Short version:

npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code
claude

It can burn a lot of tokens so don't be surprised if a lengthy session with it adds up to single digit dollars of API spend.

# 24th February 2025, 8:25 pm / llm, anthropic, claude, ai-agents, llm-reasoning, ai, llms, ai-assisted-programming, generative-ai, pelican-riding-a-bicycle, oauth, llm-release, cli, coding-agents, claude-code

files-to-prompt 0.5. My files-to-prompt tool (originally built using Claude 3 Opus back in April) had been accumulating a bunch of issues and PRs - I finally got around to spending some time with it and pushed a fresh release:

• New -n/--line-numbers flag for including line numbers in the output. Thanks, Dan Clayton. #38
• Fix for utf-8 handling on Windows. Thanks, David Jarman. #36
• --ignore patterns are now matched against directory names as well as file names, unless you pass the new --ignore-files-only flag. Thanks, Nick Powell. #30

I use this tool myself on an almost daily basis - it's fantastic for quickly answering questions about code. Recently I've been plugging it into Gemini 2.0 with its 2 million token context length, running recipes like this one:

git clone https://github.com/bytecodealliance/componentize-py
cd componentize-py
files-to-prompt . -c | llm -m gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05 \
  -s 'How does this work? Does it include a python compiler or AST trick of some sort?'

I ran that question against the bytecodealliance/componentize-py repo - which provides a tool for turning Python code into compiled WASM - and got this really useful answer.

Here's another example. I decided to have o3-mini review how Datasette handles concurrent SQLite connections from async Python code - so I ran this:

git clone https://github.com/simonw/datasette
cd datasette/datasette
files-to-prompt database.py utils/__init__.py -c | \
  llm -m o3-mini -o reasoning_effort high \
  -s 'Output in markdown a detailed analysis of how this code handles the challenge of running SQLite queries from a Python asyncio application. Explain how it works in the first section, then explore the pros and cons of this design. In a final section propose alternative mechanisms that might work better.'

Here's the result. It did an extremely good job of explaining how my code works - despite being fed just the Python and none of the other documentation. Then it made some solid recommendations for potential alternatives.

I added a couple of follow-up questions (using llm -c) which resulted in a full working prototype of an alternative threadpool mechanism, plus some benchmarks.

One final example: I decided to see if there were any undocumented features in Litestream, so I checked out the repo and ran a prompt against just the .go files in that project:

git clone https://github.com/benbjohnson/litestream
cd litestream
files-to-prompt . -e go -c | llm -m o3-mini \
  -s 'Write extensive user documentation for this project in markdown'

Once again, o3-mini provided a really impressively detailed set of unofficial documentation derived purely from reading the source.

# 14th February 2025, 4:14 am / projects, llms, gemini, llm, ai-assisted-programming, generative-ai, ai, webassembly, python, async, datasette, sqlite, litestream, files-to-prompt, llm-reasoning

Nomic Embed Text V2: An Open Source, Multilingual, Mixture-of-Experts Embedding Model (via) Nomic continue to release the most interesting and powerful embedding models. Their latest is Embed Text V2, an Apache 2.0 licensed multi-lingual 1.9GB model (here it is on Hugging Face) trained on "1.6 billion high-quality data pairs", which is the first embedding model I've seen to use a Mixture of Experts architecture:

In our experiments, we found that alternating MoE layers with 8 experts and top-2 routing provides the optimal balance between performance and efficiency. This results in 475M total parameters in the model, but only 305M active during training and inference.

I first tried it out using uv run like this:

uv run \
  --with einops \
  --with sentence-transformers \
  --python 3.13 python

Then:

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
model = SentenceTransformer("nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v2-moe", trust_remote_code=True)
sentences = ["Hello!", "¡Hola!"]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences, prompt_name="passage")
print(embeddings)

Then I got it working on my laptop using the llm-sentence-tranformers plugin like this:

llm install llm-sentence-transformers
llm install einops # additional necessary package
llm sentence-transformers register nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v2-moe --trust-remote-code

llm embed -m sentence-transformers/nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v2-moe -c 'string to embed'

This outputs a 768 item JSON array of floating point numbers to the terminal. These are Matryoshka embeddings which means you can truncate that down to just the first 256 items and get similarity calculations that still work albeit slightly less well.

To use this for RAG you'll need to conform to Nomic's custom prompt format. For documents to be searched:

search_document: text of document goes here

And for search queries:

search_query: term to search for

I landed a new --prepend option for the llm embed-multi command to help with that, but it's not out in a full release just yet. (Update: it's now out in LLM 0.22.)

I also released llm-sentence-transformers 0.3 with some minor improvements to make running this model more smooth.

# 12th February 2025, 10:24 pm / embeddings, llm, nomic, ai, rag, uv, python

llm-sort (via) Delightful LLM plugin by Evangelos Lamprou which adds the ability to perform "semantic search" - allowing you to sort the contents of a file based on using a prompt against an LLM to determine sort order.

Best illustrated by these examples from the README:

llm sort --query "Which names is more suitable for a pet monkey?" names.txt

cat titles.txt | llm sort --query "Which book should I read to cook better?"

It works using this pairwise prompt, which is executed multiple times using Python's sorted(documents, key=functools.cmp_to_key(compare_callback)) mechanism:

Given the query:
{query}

Compare the following two lines:

Line A:
{docA}

Line B:
{docB}

Which line is more relevant to the query? Please answer with "Line A" or "Line B".

From the lobste.rs comments, Cole Kurashige:

I'm not saying I'm prescient, but in The Before Times I did something similar with Mechanical Turk

This made me realize that so many of the patterns we were using against Mechanical Turk a decade+ ago can provide hints about potential ways to apply LLMs.

# 11th February 2025, 8:50 pm / llm, plugins, generative-ai, ai, llms, python, mechanical-turk

Gemini 2.0 is now available to everyone. Big new Gemini 2.0 releases today:

• Gemini 2.0 Pro (Experimental) is Google's "best model yet for coding performance and complex prompts" - currently available as a free preview.
• Gemini 2.0 Flash is now generally available.

• Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite looks particularly interesting:

  We’ve gotten a lot of positive feedback on the price and speed of 1.5 Flash. We wanted to keep improving quality, while still maintaining cost and speed. So today, we’re introducing 2.0 Flash-Lite, a new model that has better quality than 1.5 Flash, at the same speed and cost. It outperforms 1.5 Flash on the majority of benchmarks.

That means Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is priced at 7.5c/million input tokens and 30c/million output tokens - half the price of OpenAI's GPT-4o mini (15c/60c).

Gemini 2.0 Flash isn't much more expensive: 10c/million for text/image input, 70c/million for audio input, 40c/million for output. Again, cheaper than GPT-4o mini.

I pushed a new LLM plugin release, llm-gemini 0.10, adding support for the three new models:

llm install -U llm-gemini
llm keys set gemini
# paste API key here
llm -m gemini-2.0-flash "impress me"
llm -m gemini-2.0-flash-lite-preview-02-05 "impress me"
llm -m gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05 "impress me"

Here's the output for those three prompts.

I ran Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle through the three new models. Here are the results, cheapest to most expensive:

gemini-2.0-flash-lite-preview-02-05

gemini-2.0-flash

gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05

Full transcripts here.

I also ran the same prompt I tried with o3-mini the other day:

cd /tmp
git clone https://github.com/simonw/datasette
cd datasette
files-to-prompt datasette -e py -c | \
  llm -m gemini-2.0-pro-exp-02-05 \
  -s 'write extensive documentation for how the permissions system works, as markdown' \
  -o max_output_tokens 10000

Here's the result from that - you can compare that to o3-mini's result here.

# 5th February 2025, 4:37 pm / gemini, llm, google, generative-ai, llm-pricing, ai, llms, pelican-riding-a-bicycle, llm-release, files-to-prompt

o3-mini is really good at writing internal documentation. I wanted to refresh my knowledge of how the Datasette permissions system works today. I already have extensive hand-written documentation for that, but I thought it would be interesting to see if I could derive any insights from running an LLM against the codebase.

o3-mini has an input limit of 200,000 tokens. I used LLM and my files-to-prompt tool to generate the documentation like this:

cd /tmp
git clone https://github.com/simonw/datasette
cd datasette
files-to-prompt datasette -e py -c | \
  llm -m o3-mini -s \
  'write extensive documentation for how the permissions system works, as markdown'

The files-to-prompt command is fed the datasette subdirectory, which contains just the source code for the application - omitting tests (in tests/) and documentation (in docs/).

The -e py option causes it to only include files with a .py extension - skipping all of the HTML and JavaScript files in that hierarchy.

The -c option causes it to output Claude's XML-ish format - a format that works great with other LLMs too.

You can see the output of that command in this Gist.

Then I pipe that result into LLM, requesting the o3-mini OpenAI model and passing the following system prompt:

write extensive documentation for how the permissions system works, as markdown

Specifically requesting Markdown is important.

The prompt used 99,348 input tokens and produced 3,118 output tokens (320 of those were invisible reasoning tokens). That's a cost of 12.3 cents.

Honestly, the results are fantastic. I had to double-check that I hadn't accidentally fed in the documentation by mistake.

(It's possible that the model is picking up additional information about Datasette in its training set, but I've seen similar high quality results from other, newer libraries so I don't think that's a significant factor.)

In this case I already had extensive written documentation of my own, but this was still a useful refresher to help confirm that the code matched my mental model of how everything works.

Documentation of project internals as a category is notorious for going out of date. Having tricks like this to derive usable how-it-works documentation from existing codebases in just a few seconds and at a cost of a few cents is wildly valuable.

# 5th February 2025, 6:07 am / llm, openai, o3, ai, llms, datasette, generative-ai, documentation, ai-assisted-programming, llm-reasoning, files-to-prompt

OpenAI reasoning models: Advice on prompting (via) OpenAI's documentation for their o1 and o3 "reasoning models" includes some interesting tips on how to best prompt them:

• Developer messages are the new system messages: Starting with o1-2024-12-17, reasoning models support developer messages rather than system messages, to align with the chain of command behavior described in the model spec.

This appears to be a purely aesthetic change made for consistency with their instruction hierarchy concept. As far as I can tell the old system prompts continue to work exactly as before - you're encouraged to use the new developer message type but it has no impact on what actually happens.

Since my LLM tool already bakes in a llm --system "system prompt" option which works across multiple different models from different providers I'm not going to rush to adopt this new language!

• Use delimiters for clarity: Use delimiters like markdown, XML tags, and section titles to clearly indicate distinct parts of the input, helping the model interpret different sections appropriately.

Anthropic have been encouraging XML-ish delimiters for a while (I say -ish because there's no requirement that the resulting prompt is valid XML). My files-to-prompt tool has a -c option which outputs Claude-style XML, and in my experiments this same option works great with o1 and o3 too:

git clone https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo
cd limbo/bindings/python

files-to-prompt . -c | llm -m o3-mini \
  -o reasoning_effort high \
  --system 'Write a detailed README with extensive usage examples'

• Limit additional context in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): When providing additional context or documents, include only the most relevant information to prevent the model from overcomplicating its response.

This makes me thing that o1/o3 are not good models to implement RAG on at all - with RAG I like to be able to dump as much extra context into the prompt as possible and leave it to the models to figure out what's relevant.

• Try zero shot first, then few shot if needed: Reasoning models often don't need few-shot examples to produce good results, so try to write prompts without examples first. If you have more complex requirements for your desired output, it may help to include a few examples of inputs and desired outputs in your prompt. Just ensure that the examples align very closely with your prompt instructions, as discrepancies between the two may produce poor results.

Providing examples remains the single most powerful prompting tip I know, so it's interesting to see advice here to only switch to examples if zero-shot doesn't work out.

• Be very specific about your end goal: In your instructions, try to give very specific parameters for a successful response, and encourage the model to keep reasoning and iterating until it matches your success criteria.

This makes sense: reasoning models "think" until they reach a conclusion, so making the goal as unambiguous as possible leads to better results.

• Markdown formatting: Starting with o1-2024-12-17, reasoning models in the API will avoid generating responses with markdown formatting. To signal to the model when you do want markdown formatting in the response, include the string Formatting re-enabled on the first line of your developer message.

This one was a real shock to me! I noticed that o3-mini was outputting • characters instead of Markdown * bullets and initially thought that was a bug.

I first saw this while running this prompt against limbo/bindings/python using files-to-prompt:

git clone https://github.com/tursodatabase/limbo
cd limbo/bindings/python

files-to-prompt . -c | llm -m o3-mini \
  -o reasoning_effort high \
  --system 'Write a detailed README with extensive usage examples'

Here's the full result, which includes text like this (note the weird bullets):

Features
--------
• High‑performance, in‑process database engine written in Rust  
• SQLite‑compatible SQL interface  
• Standard Python DB‑API 2.0–style connection and cursor objects

I ran it again with this modified prompt:

Formatting re-enabled. Write a detailed README with extensive usage examples.

And this time got back proper Markdown, rendered in this Gist. That did a really good job, and included bulleted lists using this valid Markdown syntax instead:

- **`make test`**: Run tests using pytest.
- **`make lint`**: Run linters (via [ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff)).
- **`make check-requirements`**: Validate that the `requirements.txt` files are in sync with `pyproject.toml`.
- **`make compile-requirements`**: Compile the `requirements.txt` files using pip-tools.

(Using LLMs like this to get me off the ground with under-documented libraries is a trick I use several times a month.)

Update: OpenAI's Nikunj Handa:

we agree this is weird! fwiw, it’s a temporary thing we had to do for the existing o-series models. we’ll fix this in future releases so that you can go back to naturally prompting for markdown or no-markdown.

# 2nd February 2025, 8:56 pm / o1, openai, o3, markdown, ai, llms, prompt-engineering, generative-ai, llm-reasoning, rag, ai-assisted-programming, documentation, limbo, llm, files-to-prompt, system-prompts